Rittenhouse Square in Philadelphia, a place familiar to Bill Kleinsasser and one he used to illustrate his lectures on the subject of spatial variety (photo by Jeffrey M. Vinocur, licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Generic license).
It’s been more than three-and-a-half
decades since I first met Bill Kleinsasser. If anything, my experience as an architect since then has only
reinforced the fundamental rightness of what he espoused. The whims of fashion
did not sway him one bit, and as the years passed the latest fads or “isms” would
likewise lose their mesmeric hold over me. I realized what Bill attempted to
instill in his students was something much more fundamental about the power of design.
A good example of architecture (or
landscape architecture) is a synthesis of many essential concerns, of which one is to provide
a variety of places to be—places that are generously accommodating, lastingly
useful, opportunity-rich, efficient, and strong. Good architecture also acknowledges
our tendency as humans to favor ranges of spatial opportunity so that we have
choices about how to use a place. We instinctively seek out supports within a
setting and the freedom to control the degree to which we interact with that
place; however, there is no choice if there is insufficient spatial variety.
The following is another brief excerpt
from Bill’s self-published textbook Synthesis,
in which he succinctly describes how spatial variation contributes to the
experience of powerful, meaningful, and poetic spaces.
Choices of Places to Be, Precisely-General Places, Longevity of Support
During
its lifetime, any built place will confront many different circumstances. These
may be caused by different users, by different purposes, by the same users with
different states of mind, or by a combination of these. At the same time, built
places usually must be made relatively solidly and permanently, and in
configurations that are not easy to change. They usually outlast their first
purposes and their second, and sometimes even more. Under these circumstances
it is very easy for the built environment to become obsolete.
Built-in
spatial variety and consequent choice can help to offset this problem in built
places. When generous spatial variety exists in built places, many long-lasting
opportunities exist as well. One can experience different kinds of space; one
can find accommodation for different purposes; one can find places for things;
one can make different spatial combinations and thus realize greater space-use;
one can choose from among a variety of circulation paths; and, if incompleteness
and changeability are made a part of the spatial variety, one will be able to
participate in the configuration of the place.
Spatially
varied spaces support more purposes and needs than ordinary places and,
therefore, are more meaningful to more people over time.
Spatial
variety can be achieved by establishing an overall space (making the overall
sensible), by making sure that each of the subspaces that comprise the overall
have their own distinctive identity and spatial autonomy, and by developing
mini-spaces of a variety of types within each of the subspaces. If this spatial
variety is established, even more variety will emerge as various
sub-configurations of spaces are identified by users.
If all
these ranges of space-types are achieved, then many place opportunities will be
sensible, felt by people in the spaces. These opportunities will be the means
by which those people can find an appropriate place for any purpose, state of
mind, etc. and therefore the means by which they can find personal-ness, fit,
and meaning.
WK/1981
No comments:
Post a Comment