The Olive Garden restaurant in Eugene.
An admission: My wife and I happily frequent casual dining
chain restaurants, such as Outback Steakhouse, Red Lobster, Applebee’s, and
Olive Garden. We appreciate their convenience, consistent menu offerings, moderate
pricing, and the familiar and relaxed dining experiences they present. Just
yesterday, we partook a standardized, carb-loaded escape at the Olive Garden
restaurant here in Eugene, savoring unlimited breadsticks, salad, and pasta. Molto
gustoso!
Many people associate casual dining chain
restaurants with suburban sprawl, mass-consumerism, corporatism, and
generic, placeless experiences. Olive Garden’s carefully crafted ambience is
designed to evoke a warm and welcoming Italian trattoria, but it does so in an expectedly
ersatz manner: faux-Tuscan architecture, vintage decor, and murals depicting
Italian scenes. Critics argue the standardized design formula and menu lack the
depth and authenticity of a true, locally owned Italian restaurant. Moreover, snooty
gourmets look down upon the chain’s homogenized flavors and absence of culinary
innovation. Of course they do. Olive Garden is what it is.
Should I lose my card-carrying
urbanist credentials because I enjoy patronizing casual dining chain restaurants?
Perhaps. As an urbanist, I am supposed to be all about thoughtful urban
planning and promoting local businesses. I am supposed to advocate for vibrant,
unique neighborhoods. The proliferation of chain restaurants in the urban
landscape is anathema to the urbanist vision of creating a diverse, thriving
local food scene. Typically sited within low-density, automobile-centric settings
surrounded by parking lots, they contribute to the hinderance of lively
streetscapes essential to successful urban design. Their cookie-cutter
architecture does little to foster a desirable sense of place and community. And
given their reliance upon vast supply networks and the embodied energy inherent
in the processing and transportation of their products, casual dining chain
restaurants do not always prioritize sustainable practices.
Brand-name
casual dining establishments do have their positive attributes. One of their primary strengths is the ability to deliver consistent food
quality and dining experiences across separate locations. Customers know what
to expect from the menu, which is reassuring for those seeking familiar
experiences. Recognizable brands offer a sense of reliability and a known
standard of service. Additionally, chain restaurants are often strategically
located in commercial and easily accessible areas, including near highways and
popular shopping centers. Amidst the hustle and bustle of life, chain
restaurants offer predictability and ease. When navigating unfamiliar cities or
facing time constraints, these reliable dining spots are convivial oases.
Yesterday's lunch: Spaghetti with meat sauce, salad, and bread sticks. So how do I square the allure
of Olive Garden’s reassuring, familiar ambience, and reliable comfort food with
the urban design principles I repeatedly promote on this platform?
The key is for me to be aware
of the impact of chain restaurants on the local economy, urban sprawl, and the
character of our community. I am not blind to the issues at hand and the challenges
they pose. What are the answers? How do we support independent, local businesses
while also accommodating national chains? What can we do to better integrate
the casual dining chain restaurant model within more sustainable, less auto-oriented
urban typologies? On balance, I will continue to be enthusiastic about sustainable
development, public transportation, community engagement, and the dissemination
of good urban principles.
My guilty pleasure serves as a
reminder of the complexities of urban planning and development. It challenges
me to explore ways in which to strike a balance between diversity and
familiarity in our urban environments. Embracing chain restaurants with
self-awareness allows me to understand the dining preferences and needs of all Eugene residents, including those who seek comfort in these spaces.
Am I being hypocritical? The answer again is "perhaps." That said, it is okay to not entirely align my lifestyle
with a specific set of preferences. Being an urbanist is about engaging with broader
urban design matters and advocating for positive change in cities. The fact I
like an occasional meal at Olive Garden does not negate my interest in urbanism
or my desire for thoughtful urban planning. My indulgence only adds to the
layers of complexity that make cities fascinating and ever-evolving spaces. Like you, I
am only human, and comfort food is my kryptonite.
No comments:
Post a Comment