Sunday, October 20, 2024

Have “Starchitects” Gone the Way of the Dinosaur?


I’ve mentioned Duo Dickinson, FAIA, before. As I said previously, Duo is a prolific writer as well as an accomplished architect. He not only writes about architecture but also reflects regularly on his life, his faith, and teaching. He has published several books including The Small House: An Artful Guide to Affordable Residential Design, and A Home Called New England: A Celebration of Hearth and History, cowritten with Steve Culpepper. He has also written for many online and traditional print outlets, including Common EdgeFine HomebuildingThis Old House MagazineArch DailyMoney MagazineHouzz, and Archinect. Duo is an adjunct professor at the University of Hartford and teaches at the Building Beauty Program in Sorrento, Italy. 

If all that were not enough, Duo additionally hosts a monthly podcast (Home Page Radio with Duo Dickinson) on WPKN, a listener-supported community radio station that broadcasts at 89.5 FM in Bridgeport, CT and streams online at WPKN.org. For the most recent installment, which aired on October 16, Duo spoke with Martin Pedersen, executive director of the Common Edge Collaborative, and John Connell, cofounder of Yestermorrow. The topic at hand was whether the golden era of the hero architects—the “starchitects”—has passed into history. 

Playing devil’s advocate, Duo asserted that a “century of top-down determination is over,” wherein the power of style as sanctified by an elite cabal of tastemakers and epitomized by the starchitects they anointed has been eclipsed by the Internet’s democratization of mass media. The pedestals this cabal erected to promote their chosen prodigies have crumbled. So too have the intellectual underpinnings upon which the starchitects established their legitimacy. Such outsized personalities as Frank Lloyd Wright, Le Corbusier, Mies van der Rohe, Louis Kahn, Eero Saarinen, Philip Johnson, Robert Venturi, Michael Graves, and Frank Gehry (and their respective treatises or design philosophies) do not command the public’s attention as they once did. The last of the true starchitects—those who dominated the architectural scene—may have been Zaha Hadid.(1) In Duo’s mind, imagery now trumps insight in a world increasingly ruled by popularity contests rendered on 4K displays. 

Martin Pedersen largely agreed with Duo, though he cited Neri Oxman as someone who, by virtue of her pioneering work in the field of bio-architecture and material ecology, media savvy, and physical attractiveness meets some of the criteria of a 21st century starchitect.(2) Having said that, Martin doesn’t believe Oxman’s Q-rating—the measurement of her public familiarity and appeal—comes anywhere close to that of her great 20th century forebears. Frank Lloyd Wright is probably the only architect average people know of, and he’s been dead for 65 years. 

Starchitects were once the movie stars of the profession. To the extent they were on the public stage, starchitects embodied the hopes and aspirations of many for the future of our built environment. They personified design. Think of Michael Graves and his designs of consumer products for Target. He became a household name for designing mere tea kettles, toasters, and timepieces, let alone his buildings. 

Martin expressed his belief that, in addition to the ascendency of online outlets, the Great Recession of 2008-2009 further led to the decline of the dominant starchitects by hurting the legacy architectural media. In this, he bolstered Duo’s argument that it was that limited group of pre-Internet media outlets (mostly the prestigious trade “glossies” and architectural critics at the nation’s largest newspapers) that fostered the culture of starchitecture. Martin predicted the future of the architecture media is not necessarily bad but is unresolved, the universal coarsening of our discourse being the most challenging concern. 

John Connell concurred, saying that when he and his cohort left school they were all figuring out how to establish their own individual brand. The big difference now is that the emphasis has necessarily shifted to being part of a team. John pointed to the immense complexity of even modest buildings. There is so much involved in their making—the volume of code requirements alone is often overwhelming—that it is near impossible for one individual to fully master all aspects of their design. Consequently, working as part of a team is the order of the day, a fact architecture schools are increasingly and correctly impressing upon students. For better or worse, starchitecture is thus in decline. 

So, is it time for us to let go of the 20th century concept of the “starchitect?” Is the concept now an anachronism and an antique vestige of how we and the public once perceived the profession? I’m not sure it is. Duo argued that students these days don’t even know what the term “starchitect” means. In his view, the power of style has vanished and does not exist in the way it did back in the day when he and I were in school (Duo received his degree in architecture in 1977, while I did in 1983). Despite Duo’s claim that his students don’t have their stars, I wonder if our perception of the decline of the hero architect is in error and the reality more nuanced. 

People want and need their heroes, and today’s younger generation is no exception. Yes, architecture is an increasingly complex undertaking, and the notion that singular role models hold as much sway as they once did is daft at face value. Then again, I believe inspiring leadership by people of the caliber once personified by the starchitects of the day remains desirable. I have been and continue to be thrilled by the dreams and outstanding achievements of truly visionary individuals. 

We continue to live in an analog world and, as Duo has said, things that are truly artisanal are analog in nature. Swiping between online images doesn’t leave room for the humanity of the creators of the architecture the images depict. Starchitects embodied that humanity. I like to think we will continue to see new generations of such visionaries, and that they have not gone the way of the dinosaurs. 

*    *    *    *    *   

If you’re into podcasts and thinking about architecture, I recommend checking out Home Page Radio with Duo Dickinson. Each episode features one or more thoughtful guests who bring varied perspectives to the topics at hand (which are most often associated with the design of homes, but some also touch upon urbanism and architecture in general). I’m not an avid listener of podcasts, but I do enjoy tuning into Home Page Radio. For me, it helps that Duo has a mellifluously perfect radio voice and that he skillfully poses questions that prompt cogent responses. As the days grow shorter and drearier, I look forward to listening to additional episodes of Home Page Radio this fall and winter. 

(1)  Notably, Hadid’s firm paid $16 million to the Zaha Hadid Foundation for the right to continue to use her name, a testament to the power of her brand and persona. 

(2)  Though not mentioned by either Martin or Duo, I think Bjarke Ingels might also qualify as a present-day starchitect.

2 comments:

Shamila Z said...

Frank Gehry?
Tadao Ando?
Renzo Piano?
Mario Botta?
Toyo Ito?
Norman Foster?
Are they too old for this club🧐

Randy Nishimura, AIA Architect Emeritus, CSI, CCS said...

@Shamila Z: I did mention Frank Gehry. The others you list are certainly (late) 20th century (and early 21st century) starchitects as well, but all became regarded as so before the advent of instantaneous online fame.